How to Generate a Secure Random Password in JavaScript and Python
Most "random" password generators people write with Math.random() aren't actually secure. For a password that resists brute-force attacks, you need a cryptographically secure random number generator. This guide shows how to generate strong passwords correctly.
What makes a password secure?
Two factors determine password strength: length and character set size. Entropy (in bits) captures both:
entropy = log2(character_set_size ^ length)
= length × log2(character_set_size)
Practical targets:
- 128 bits — secure for most uses (equivalent to a random 128-bit key)
- 80 bits — minimum for anything important
- < 40 bits — crackable with consumer hardware
| Password type | Bits per character | Length for 128-bit entropy |
|---|---|---|
| Lowercase only (26 chars) | 4.7 | 28 characters |
| Mixed case + digits (62 chars) | 5.95 | 22 characters |
| Full printable ASCII (94 chars) | 6.55 | 20 characters |
| Diceware word (7,776 words) | 12.9 | 10 words |
A 20-character password using uppercase, lowercase, digits, and symbols has ~128 bits of entropy. That's the target.
JavaScript — browser
Use crypto.getRandomValues() — the only correct API for this. Never use Math.random().
function generatePassword(length = 20, options = {}) {
const {
uppercase = true,
lowercase = true,
digits = true,
symbols = true,
} = options;
let chars = '';
if (uppercase) chars += 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ';
if (lowercase) chars += 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
if (digits) chars += '0123456789';
if (symbols) chars += '!@#$%^&*()-_=+[]{}|;:,.<>?';
if (!chars) throw new Error('At least one character set must be enabled');
const array = new Uint32Array(length);
crypto.getRandomValues(array);
return Array.from(array, x => chars[x % chars.length]).join('');
}
console.log(generatePassword(20));
// "kT9!mP2#xQ7@rL5$nW8^"
Why the modulo bias issue doesn't matter much here: Uint32Array gives values 0–4,294,967,295. If your character set has 94 characters, the modulo isn't perfectly uniform — but the bias is tiny (less than 0.001%), which is irrelevant for password generation.
If you need perfect uniformity (e.g., for cryptographic key material), use rejection sampling:
function secureSample(chars, length) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < length) {
const bytes = new Uint8Array(length * 2);
crypto.getRandomValues(bytes);
for (const b of bytes) {
if (result.length >= length) break;
if (b < Math.floor(256 / chars.length) * chars.length) {
result.push(chars[b % chars.length]);
}
}
}
return result.join('');
}
JavaScript — Node.js
const crypto = require('crypto');
function generatePassword(length = 20) {
const chars = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789!@#$%^&*()';
const bytes = crypto.randomBytes(length);
return Array.from(bytes, b => chars[b % chars.length]).join('');
}
console.log(generatePassword(24));
// "Xm9kQ!rL2nP@jT5vW8sZ#hK"
Or using crypto.randomUUID() + trimming for a quick random string (not ideal — limited character set):
// Quick and dirty — uses only hex characters (0-9, a-f)
const id = crypto.randomUUID().replace(/-/g, '');
Python
Python's secrets module (Python 3.6+) is the correct tool — it uses the OS's cryptographically secure RNG.
import secrets
import string
def generate_password(length: int = 20) -> str:
alphabet = string.ascii_letters + string.digits + string.punctuation
return ''.join(secrets.choice(alphabet) for _ in range(length))
print(generate_password(20))
# "k!T9mP2#xQ7@rL5$nW8^"
secrets.choice() picks from the sequence using the OS CSPRNG. This is the right function. Don't use random.choice() — the random module is not cryptographically secure.
Custom character sets:
import secrets
import string
def generate_password(
length: int = 20,
uppercase: bool = True,
lowercase: bool = True,
digits: bool = True,
symbols: bool = True,
) -> str:
chars = ''
required = []
if uppercase:
chars += string.ascii_uppercase
required.append(secrets.choice(string.ascii_uppercase))
if lowercase:
chars += string.ascii_lowercase
required.append(secrets.choice(string.ascii_lowercase))
if digits:
chars += string.digits
required.append(secrets.choice(string.digits))
if symbols:
sym = '!@#$%^&*()-_=+[]{}|;:,.<>?'
chars += sym
required.append(secrets.choice(sym))
if not chars:
raise ValueError('At least one character set must be enabled')
# Fill remaining length with random choices from full set
remaining = length - len(required)
pool = required + [secrets.choice(chars) for _ in range(remaining)]
# Shuffle to avoid predictable positions (first char always uppercase, etc.)
secrets.SystemRandom().shuffle(pool)
return ''.join(pool)
print(generate_password(24))
This guarantees at least one character from each enabled set, then shuffles — so the first character isn't predictably uppercase.
Command line
macOS/Linux — openssl:
# 20-char base64 password
openssl rand -base64 20
# 20-char hex password
openssl rand -hex 20
# Alphanumeric-only (strip special characters)
openssl rand -base64 32 | tr -dc 'a-zA-Z0-9' | head -c 20
Linux — /dev/urandom:
# Printable ASCII characters
cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-zA-Z0-9!@#$%^&*' | head -c 20; echo
Python one-liner:
python3 -c "import secrets, string; print(''.join(secrets.choice(string.ascii_letters + string.digits + '!@#$%^&*') for _ in range(20)))"
Passphrases (Diceware)
A passphrase of 4–6 random words from a large wordlist can be more secure than a shorter random password — and much easier to remember.
import secrets
# EFF large wordlist has 7776 words (6 dice rolls)
# Download: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/07/18/eff_large_wordlist.txt
def generate_passphrase(word_count: int = 5, wordlist_path: str = 'eff_large_wordlist.txt') -> str:
with open(wordlist_path) as f:
words = [line.split('\t')[1].strip() for line in f if '\t' in line]
return '-'.join(secrets.choice(words) for _ in range(word_count))
print(generate_passphrase(5))
# "crumpet-waffle-harbor-slime-donkey"
5 words from the EFF wordlist gives ~64.6 bits of entropy. 6 words gives ~77.5 bits — equivalent to a 12-character random password with full ASCII.
What NOT to use
Math.random()(JavaScript) — uses a PRNG, not a CSPRNG. Predictable if seeded.random.random()/random.choice()(Python) — same problem.- Any system that hashes a timestamp or username — not random.
- Passwords under 12 characters — too short for anything sensitive.
Key takeaways
- Use
crypto.getRandomValues()in browser JavaScript,crypto.randomBytes()in Node.js. - Use
secrets.choice()in Python — notrandom.choice(). - Use
openssl randfrom the command line. - Target 20+ characters with mixed character sets for ~128 bits of entropy.
- Passphrases (Diceware) are an excellent alternative — longer and more memorable.